If you want to transcode, RS is the way to go. With RS you have dedicated cpu cores.
If you want to transcode, RS is the way to go. With RS you have dedicated cpu cores.
First of all Thank you for your answer. i was wondering, if you can transcode with the VPS or if its not possible? I mean the VPS ARM 2000 has 10 Cores and 16 GB of RAM abd the RS 1000 has 4 Cores and half the RAM but costs less. Both have SSD so write Speeds should be equal?
I hope for an explanation.
Greetings Chris
i was wondering, if you can transcode with the VPS or if its not possible?
Of course you can transcode with VPS. But it will be slower because you share your cores with more people.
So for example 4 cores of RS can transcode faster than 6 cores of a VPS (just an example, I didn't measured it). In the end you could try and use satisfaction guarantee if it's not working for your case.
Of course you can transcode with VPS. But it will be slower because you share your cores with more people.
So for example 4 cores of RS can transcode faster than 6 cores of a VPS (just an example, I didn't measured it). In the end you could try and use satisfaction guarantee if it's not working for your case.
Okay thank you very much. This makes Sense. But is the SSD Disk Speed the Same as an RS Server? Or will i share the Disk and get less Write Speed? 
VPS like RS are virtual servers. The resources are therefore shared with other customers for both.
You are only guaranteed the CPU resources with the RS.
RS does not mean that you are the only customer on the host hardware.
But is the SSD Disk Speed the Same as an RS Server?
Take a look at this: https://forum.netcup.de/administration…s-vps-produkte/
There you can find a lot of benchmark results.
Neu erstellte Beiträge unterliegen der Moderation und werden erst sichtbar, wenn sie durch einen Moderator geprüft und freigeschaltet wurden.
Die letzte Antwort auf dieses Thema liegt mehr als 365 Tage zurück. Das Thema ist womöglich bereits veraltet. Bitte erstellen Sie ggf. ein neues Thema.
