The price difference is too little, I'm just going to go with the root server.
Beiträge von Zulan
-
-
What kind of performance are you looking for? Throughput or IOPS?
IOPS, since on my RS2000 they are very sluggish even at around 30% cpu and mem usage. I suspect is all down to to many small read/writes to the disk.
-
I am looking to get another server. The disk performance is what is limiting me from using larger servers, since they run out of juice a lot faster then memory and disk on my RS2000. Since CPU and memory isn't my biggest concern I'm thinking maybe try VPS instead of RS. I'm thinking of RS1000 or VPS1000. I have tried looking through the benchmark page but it's not clear to me what kind of difference in perofrmance to expect? What is your experience?
-
You might be testing the RAM cache of the servers most of the time. I wouldn't care too much about raw numbers and just use the servers. If the performance is not good enough, change to a different server or provider.
Yeah, you are probably right. Thanks again.
-
No, I meant this:
Ah, sorry for misunderstanding. All servers use VIRTIO driver.
-
I'm not sure how much scientific value this has, but I tried copying the windows server ISO of 4gb on the servers. Just from one folder to another on the same drive. The US servers did that in about half the time the german servers did. This just adds to the confusion.
-
Have you selected the same drivers in SCP at Media > Local Disks?
The machines are installed maybe 1 year apart so drivers might differ in version. But I used the provided driver disk for drivers on all servers. If I check in device manager/Disk drives/ and check the drivers, they all use microsoft driver
-
So to sum up the problem. I have 1 RS2000 G9.5 based in Germany and two RS2000 G11 based in US.
All three servers have about the same performance when benchmarking with yabs.But in windows the US servers have considerably lower performance tested using two different benchmarks, not only visible in benchmarks but also noticeable when the servers are under load.
All three servers use windows 2022 standard.
One theory I have is it might be something with caching since the write speeds I get in windows is similar to what I get with linux and the read speeds are just insanely high compared to the linux tests. So I guess linux does not use caching. I have not changed any caching settings on either of the machines so it's still confusing.
I can now see what you meant TBT and I'm sorry barked at you.
-
I tested it using Atto Disk benchmark as well. Here you really see the difference. The operating system is a default Windows standard 2022.
First image is the US server.
I have a second US RS2000 G11 server with the same operatingsystem and the same performance difference in read/write.
I also have a small vps 1000 G10 based in nurnberg de and it also has similar disk performance both read/write.
This is not a problem only visible in benchmarks. I can clearly see how sluggish the US servers are compared to the DE. -
I had to mount the /dev/vdb3 disk instead and now it works. Now there is no longer any difference between read/write. I am not sure what conclusions I can actually draw from this.
Code
Alles anzeigen# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## # # Yet-Another-Bench-Script # # v2024-06-09 # # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script # # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## # Sat Aug 10 01:09:21 PM UTC 2024 Basic System Information: --------------------------------- Uptime : 0 days, 1 hours, 29 minutes Processor : AMD EPYC 9634 84-Core Processor CPU cores : 8 @ 2246.624 MHz AES-NI : ✔ Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled RAM : 15.6 GiB Swap : 0.0 KiB Disk : 511.1 GiB Distro : Debian GNU/Linux bookworm/sid Kernel : 6.0.0-4-amd64 VM Type : MICROSOFT IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline IPv4 Network Information: --------------------------------- ISP : netcup GmbH ASN : AS214996 netcup GmbH Host : netcup GmbH Location : Manassas, Virginia (VA) Country : United States fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vdb3): --------------------------------- Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS) ------ | --- ---- | ---- ---- Read | 69.11 MB/s (17.2k) | 662.75 MB/s (10.3k) Write | 69.32 MB/s (17.3k) | 666.24 MB/s (10.4k) Total | 138.43 MB/s (34.6k) | 1.32 GB/s (20.7k) | | Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS) ------ | --- ---- | ---- ---- Read | 1.25 GB/s (2.4k) | 1.21 GB/s (1.1k) Write | 1.31 GB/s (2.5k) | 1.30 GB/s (1.2k) Total | 2.56 GB/s (5.0k) | 2.52 GB/s (2.4k) iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4): --------------------------------- Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping ----- | ----- | ---- | ---- | ---- Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 1.58 Gbits/sec | 1.13 Gbits/sec | 78.4 ms Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 1.87 Gbits/sec | 2.01 Gbits/sec | 94.6 ms Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 891 Mbits/sec | 413 Mbits/sec | 174 ms Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | busy | 620 Mbits/sec | 238 ms Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.95 Gbits/sec | 2.14 Gbits/sec | 55.7 ms Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 2.74 Gbits/sec | 2.33 Gbits/sec | 7.43 ms Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 1.44 Gbits/sec | 922 Mbits/sec | 140 ms Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test: --------------------------------- Test | Value | Single Core | 1508 Multi Core | 7415 Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7274490 YABS completed in 10 min 36 sec -
I also played through it again and you can get it to work like this:
Code
Alles anzeigencd /mnt/ mkdir hdd1 mount -tauto /dev/vdb1 /mnt/hdd1 # for example cd /mnt/hdd1 echo "nameserver 1.1.1.1" >> /etc/resolv.conf wget -4 https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script/archive/refs/heads/master.zip unzip master.zip cd yet-another-bench-script-master/ bash yabs.sh -ignNow the tests run, but the disk tests only gives out 0:s.
io Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition overlay):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 0.00 KB/s (0) | 0.00 KB/s (0)
Write | 0.00 KB/s (0) | 0.00 KB/s (0)
Total | 0.00 KB/s (0) | 0.00 KB/s (0)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 0.00 KB/s (0) | 0.00 KB/s (0)
Write | 0.00 KB/s (0) | 0.00 KB/s (0)
Total | 0.00 KB/s (0) | 0.00 KB/s (0)
-
I found the solution, there was no name servers in the rescue os.
-
Thank you Andreas, I did that, but I get no confirmation it's running, has completed or anything. I went to All Yab Runs | VPSBenchmarks but I can't see anything from netcup there today. It's my understanding it will run the benchmark and upload the results to vpsbenchmarks? I then tried running curl -sL yabs.sh | bash to see if that changed anything but got the exactly same, nothing, prompt just goes to next level with no output.
-
Thanks for all your answers guys! It was crystaldiskmark that gave me the numbers. I am not sure how they have calculated the MB but it looks like this:
CrystalDiskMark test US server RS2000 G11
And my older G9 RS2000 server gives me the highest numbers of 4000 both read/write.
Anyone has any idea how to get yabs to run on windows? Virtualization is not enabled in bios and I'm not sure how to edit bios settings. I would think crystal diskmark shows my point anyway?
-
-
Hello, I have 2 root servers in USA and several in Germany. I have noticed bad performance on the USA servers and it seems to be due to disk performance. Using a simple crystaldiskmark I can see that the write performance is quite bad on both the US servers. Around 500MB/s compared to Germany based servers that give similar write performance as read, somewhere around 4000MB/s. Is this is due to a problem, or is this the expected performance? If so I will have to move back the servers.