seems RS 1000 G11 performance a lot better: https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/6224213
What CPU is VPS 1000 G11 actually using?
7702 ，Previously, the CPU of RS G9.5
Posts by ptervip
-
-
Is RS1000SE Vienna g11 or G9.5? I'm looking forward to it.
-
Have you noticed that the VPS traffic rules for ARM have been modified again without any notification. I want to know if the traffic rules for ARM VPS that are already in use are based on the latest rules or the rules at the time of purchase. If following the latest revised rules, is there a risk of breach of contract involved.
Also, is the traffic rule of the old RS series G9.5 machine consistent with the past, or will it be updated to the new traffic rule? Does it also involve contract violations? Many people's G9.5 machines are restricted to 500M bandwidth due to T&Cs 5.5 reasons. Whether it is compliant or not, the reasons given for violation are very abstract.
-
You just occupy RAM, there's no problem with that. Although mining is prohibited, no one cares about you.
-
Because the hosts are getting filled with VMs. In general such benchmarks are only helpful to a certain degree.
Running the benchmarks at different times of the day will also affect the results.
This is mainly a performance value set by the host company. On the day of the release of the 11th generation on March 7th, it can be seen that almost all RS2000's performance fluctuates by no more than 500 points. From 11000 to over 8000, it is obvious that the performance limit set by the host company has been adjusted.
-
interessant, der RS1000 hat im Multi Core ~6500, der RS2000 dann schon ~11200 und der bombastische RS16000 ~18750.
Da bin ich mal gespannt auf was der RS4000 dann kommt
Now the performance is gradually declining, and it is unclear which score it will stop at.
-
Display More
Root Server 2000 G 11
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
# Yet-Another-Bench-Script #
# v2024-03-05 #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
Do 7. Mär 17:23:36 CET 2024
Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime : 0 days, 0 hours, 6 minutes
Processor : AMD EPYC 9634 84-Core Processor
CPU cores : 8 @ 2246.622 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM : 15.6 GiB
Swap : 0.0 KiB
Disk : 503.8 GiB
Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel : 6.1.0-18-amd64
VM Type : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP : netcup GmbH
ASN : AS197540 netcup GmbH
Host : NETCUP-GMBH
Location : Karlsruhe, Baden-Wurttemberg (BW)
Country : Germany
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda3):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 243.36 MB/s (60.8k) | 542.58 MB/s (8.4k)
Write | 244.00 MB/s (61.0k) | 545.43 MB/s (8.5k)
Total | 487.36 MB/s (121.8k) | 1.08 GB/s (16.9k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 585.85 MB/s (1.1k) | 837.28 MB/s (817)
Write | 616.98 MB/s (1.2k) | 893.04 MB/s (872)
Total | 1.20 GB/s (2.3k) | 1.73 GB/s (1.6k)
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
----- | ----- | ---- | ---- | ----
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 2.53 Gbits/sec | busy | 22.4 ms
Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (10G) | 2.72 Gbits/sec | 2.37 Gbits/sec | 10.4 ms
HOSTKEY | Helsinki, FI (10G) | 925 Mbits/sec | 930 Mbits/sec | 29.4 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 555 Mbits/sec | 1.88 Gbits/sec | 306 ms
Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 1.90 Gbits/sec | 1.62 Gbits/sec | 163 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.01 Gbits/sec | 399 Mbits/sec | 150 ms
Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 2.33 Gbits/sec | 1.85 Gbits/sec | 91.5 ms
Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 1.53 Gbits/sec | 413 Mbits/sec | 163 ms
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
----- | ----- | ---- | ---- | ----
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 2.62 Gbits/sec | 2.32 Gbits/sec | 22.4 ms
Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (10G) | 2.73 Gbits/sec | 2.33 Gbits/sec | 10.3 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 778 Mbits/sec | 1.46 Gbits/sec | 82.1 ms
Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 1.79 Gbits/sec | 1.89 Gbits/sec | 163 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.08 Gbits/sec | 330 Mbits/sec | 150 ms
Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 2.46 Gbits/sec | 2.01 Gbits/sec | 91.6 ms
Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 1.45 Gbits/sec | 793 Mbits/sec | 163 ms
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 2046
Multi Core | 11189
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5216017
YABS completed in 11 min 50 sec
A few days ago, the Geekbench5 test score was 11028. https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/22296257 Now, it seems that the performance of RS2000G11 has been declining, and the latest test score is only 8287.
-
Die RS-Serie CPU ist dediziert und unterscheidet sich von VPS. Wir hoffen, eine RS 500 produzieren zu können.
-
Die Konfiguration mit 2 Kernen, 4 GB RAM und 80 GB Speicher scheint mir beliebter zu sein.
-
-
SCP cannot be accessed. Is there a problem?
Sorry, this should not happen.
A critical server error has occurred. If the error occurs again, please contact the support team.
-
I have contacted several times. They all said they would forward it to the corresponding department for processing, but they haven't handled it. I don't know why it is so chaotic. The problem is very simple, but it just can't be handled.
Display MoreHey ptervip,
this is a customer forum - so most of the readers here are customers themself and can't help you with your problem.
The billing is done automatically and the software is designed this way.
In the CCP you can directly contact the billing department - maybe the 1st level support has a bottleneck here.
-
I hope your finance can be more efficient and professional. It's a pity that a very simple calculation has not been completed in more than seven days, and I have sent several emails to reflect the problem. It has not been solved yet, and I don't know how to solve it. It seems that your finance is amateur, and the bill issued is also very confused. I hope someone can actually solve it. This is not a problem, The problem is that no one wants to solve it. It has been delayed for so long.
-
About seven days have passed, and your financial department has not calculated it clearly! It now shows that my product has not been paid. Therefore, it cannot be transferred out.
I don't know why it is so difficult for you to calculate the commission and the amount of deduction. In fact, it is very simple.
I hope to solve my problem as soon as possible. I have sent several emails, but it has not been solved yet. The background bill is also wrong.
