Beiträge von azizulislam

    You do not have 1Gbit/s uplink to the internet.


    Source: https://www.netcup.eu/vserver/#features "Traffic flatrate (?)"


    However netcup-internally there are 1Gbit/s available, so the port speed is indeed 1Gbit/s.

    H*tzner has a 1Gbit/s Uplink to the internet

    Thank you for clarification!


    My question is why two different VPS of Netcup showing different network speed?


    Dedicated NIC 1GBits/s = 35.70€ + Set-up fee: 20€ =O I can rent very good dedicated server! ;)

    I have servers with First Root and Het_zner with 1 Gbit/s port. Here is network test results:


    First Root 97.8MB/s

    [root@froot ~]# wget -O /dev/null http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test

    --2018-03-05 22:05:46-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test

    Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net (cachefly.cachefly.net)... 205.234.175.175

    Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net (cachefly.cachefly.net)|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.

    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK

    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]

    Saving to: ‘/dev/null’


    100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 97.8MB/s in 1.0s


    2018-03-05 22:05:47 (97.8 MB/s) - ‘/dev/null’ saved [104857600/104857600]


    Hetz_Ner 101M/s


    [root@hetz_ner ~]# wget -O /dev/null http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test

    --2018-03-05 22:07:28-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test

    Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175

    Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.

    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK

    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]

    Saving to: “/dev/null”


    100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 101M/s in 1.0s


    2018-03-05 22:07:29 (101 MB/s) - “/dev/null” saved [104857600/104857600]


    I think Netcup port speed is NOT 1 Gbit/s


    Thanks,

    Hello All,

    I am facing slow network speed problem with my VPS:

    New VPS: New KVM Version (32.1MB/s)

    [root@server2 ~]# wget -O /dev/null http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test

    --2018-03-05 08:12:48-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test

    Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net (cachefly.cachefly.net)... 205.234.175.175

    Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net (cachefly.cachefly.net)|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.

    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK

    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]

    Saving to: ‘/dev/null’

    100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 32.1MB/s in 3.1s

    2018-03-05 08:12:51 (32.1 MB/s) - ‘/dev/null’ saved [104857600/104857600]

    [root@server2 ~]#


    Old VPS: Old KVM Version (83.5M/s)


    [root@server3 ~]# wget -O /dev/null http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test

    --2018-03-05 08:17:28-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test

    Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175

    Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.

    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK

    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]

    Saving to: “/dev/null”


    100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 83.5M/s in 1.2s


    2018-03-05 08:17:29 (83.5 MB/s) - “/dev/null” saved [104857600/104857600]

    [root@server3 ~]#


    Anyone facing same issue with new KVM version?


    Thanks

    Here is the output:


    [root@003 ~]# sudo fdisk -l


    Disk /dev/loop0: 4294 MB, 4294967296 bytes

    255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 522 cylinders

    Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

    Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

    I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

    Disk identifier: 0x00000000



    WARNING: GPT (GUID Partition Table) detected on '/dev/sda'! The util fdisk doesn't support GPT. Use GNU Parted.



    Disk /dev/sda: 1006.6 GB, 1006632960000 bytes

    255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 122382 cylinders

    Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

    Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

    I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

    Disk identifier: 0x00000000


    Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System

    /dev/sda1 1 91771 737148927+ ee GPT

    [root@003 ~]#

    Hello All,

    I upgraded my RS 3000 SAS G7 SE to RS 4000 SAS G7 SE. Everything looks good (8 CPUs, 24GB of RAM) but Disk Space showing still 720GB SAS.


    [root@003 ~]# df -h

    Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on

    /dev/sda3 691G 224G 432G 35% /

    tmpfs 12G 0 12G 0% /dev/shm

    /dev/sda1 477M 134M 318M 30% /boot

    /usr/tmpDSK 4.0G 137M 3.7G 4% /tmp

    [root@003 ~]#


    After Up-gradation DISK IO also too slow:


    [root@003 ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync && rm -f test

    16384+0 records in

    16384+0 records out

    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 13.5617 s, 79.2 MB/s

    [root@003 ~]#


    How can I fix this?

    Thank you,